Stability analysis of surrounding rock of multi-cavern for compressed air energy storage

Authors

  • Wendong Ji* China Energy Digital Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, P. R. China (Email: wdji5151@ceec.net.cn)
  • Shu Wang School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, P. R. China
  • Jifang Wan China Energy Digital Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, P. R. China
  • Shaozhen Cheng China Energy Digital Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, P. R. China
  • Jiaxin He China Energy Digital Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, P. R. China
  • Shaohua Shi China Energy Digital Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, P. R. China

Keywords:

Compressed air energy storage, working pressure, cavern type, pillar space, cavern diameter

Abstract

Compressed air energy storage in artificial caverns can mitigate the dependence on salt cavern and waste mines, as well as realize the rapid consumption of new energy and the “peak-cutting and valley-filling” of the power grid. At the same time, the safety and stability of the surrounding rock of gas storage has attracted extensive attention. Based on finite element simulation, a numerical model of shallow-buried double-chamber for compressed air energy storage is established, and the influence of working pressure, cavern type, pillar space, and cavern diameter on the mechanical behavior of surrounding rock is analyzed. It is discovered that the cavern type significantly affects the response of the surrounding rock, whose deformation and plastic strain in the horseshoe-shaped cavern is significantly larger than that in the circular cavern. For circular caverns, the pillar space of 2∼3 times the cavern diameter is only suitable for low working pressure, and the plastic strain and deformation of surrounding rock increases sharply with the increase of working pressure. It is more appropriate to select the pillar space that is 4 times the cavern diameter when the working pressure is greater than 16 MPa. With the increase in the cavern diameter, the maximum deformation of the surrounding rock accelerates rapidly.

Document Type: Short communication

Cited as: Ji, W., Wang, S., Wan, J., Cheng, S., He, J., Shi, S. Stability analysis of surrounding rock of multi-cavern for compressed air energy storage. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2024, 13(3): 169-175. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.09.03

References

Jafarizadeh, H., Soltani, M., Nathwani, J. Assessment of the Huntorf compressed air energy storage plant performance under enhanced modifications. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 209: 112662.

Jiang, Z., Li, P., Zhao, H., et al. Experimental study on performance of shallow rock cavern for compressed air energy storage. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 235-241. (in Chinese)

Kim, C., Chen, L., Wang, H., et al. Global and local parameters for characterizing and modeling external corrosion in underground coated steel pipelines: A review of critical factors. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 2021, 1(1): 17-35.

Kushnir, R., Dayan, A., Ullmann, A. Temperature and pressure variations within compressed air energy storage caverns. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(21-22): 5616-5630.

Leis, B. Evolution of metal-loss severity criteria: Gaps and a path forward. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 2021, 1(1): 51-62.

Lund, H., Salgi, G. The role of compressed air energy storage (CAES) in future sustainable energy systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50(5): 1172-1179.

Marcus, B., Daniel, W., Roland, S., et al. A review on compressed air energy storage: Basic principles, past milestones and recent developments. Applied Energy, 2016, 170: 250-268.

Peng, W., Shang, H., Ji, W., et al. Key process of artificial chamber siting for compressed air energy storage power plant. Electric Power Survey and Design, 2023, 180: 46-49. (in Chinese)

Rutqvist, J., Kim, H., Ryu, D., et al. Modeling of coupled thermodynamic and geomechanical performance of underground compressed air energy storage in lined rock caverns. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2012, 52: 71-81.

Serbin, K., Slizowski, J., Urbanczyk, K., et al. The influence of thermodynamic effects on gas storage cavern convergence. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 79: 166-171.

Wan, J., Meng, T., Li, J., et al. Energy storage salt cavern construction and evaluation technology. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2023, 9: 141-145.

Wan, J., Sun, Y., He, Y., et al. Development and technology status of energy storage in depleted gas reservoirs. In ternational Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2024, 11: 29.

Wang, F., Wang, H., Wu, M., et al. Compressed air energy storage technology and development. Hydropower Generation, 2022, 48(11): 10-15.

Xia, C., Zhang, P., Zhou, S., et al. Stability and tangential strain analysis of large-scale compressed air energy storage cavern. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(5): 1391-1398. (in Chinese)

Zhou, S., Xia, C., Du, S., et al. An analytical solution for mechanical responses induced by temperature and air pressure in a lined rock cavern for underground compressed air energy storage. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(2): 749-770.

Zimmels, Y., Kirzhner, F., Krasovitski, B. Design criteria for compressed air storage in hard rock. Energy and Environment, 2002, 13(6): 851-872.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles