Establishing credible reaction-kinetics distributions to fit and explain multi-heating rate S2 pyrolysis peaks of kerogens and shales

Abstract

Extracting reaction-kinetic distributions, in terms of activation energies (E) and pre-exponential factors (A), from the S2 peak data generated by pyrolysis tests conducted at three or more distinct heating ramps, is a well-established technique. These reaction-kinetics distributions are of paramount importance in establishing the timing and degree of petroleum generation from shales undergoing a range of burial and thermal histories. A commonly adopted approach is to determine and define reaction kinetics using a derivative of the Arrhenius equation configured in terms of a fixed/constant A value. Although the fixed-A approach can obtain good fits to multi-rate pyrolysis data, here it is shown that a formulation of the Arrhenius equation that involves reactions with a range of E and A values provides equally good fits to the multi-rate pyrolysis data. Moreover, the kinetic distributions with variable E-A provide more credible reaction kinetics consistent with those established for a range of kerogen types known for decades. To establish accurate fits to multi-rate pyrolysis S2 peak data at 1 ◦C intervals from 250 ◦C to 700 ◦C an optimizer is applied to the preferred Arrhenius equation formulation to derive reaction increments and transformation fractions to a range of reaction kinetics (E-A pairs). The methodology applied involves two steps: Step 1 finds the single E-A pair that best matches the S2 peak temperatures (three or more for multi-rate pyrolysis data); step 2 uses the E-A pair from step 1 as its modal focus and fits the full S2 peak shape using a distribution of 11 distinct reaction. This approach can replicate the fixed-A approach but is best applied using reactions with variable E-A values. The results of applying this method to multi-rate pyrolysis data for ten published kerogens and shales show credible kinetic distributions spread along the established E-A trend for kerogen/shales.

Cited as: Wood, D.A. Establishing credible reaction-kinetics distributions to fit and explain multi-heating rate S2 pyrolysis peaks of kerogens and shales. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2019, 3(1): 1-28, doi: 10.26804/ager.2019.01.01

References

Abbassi, S., Edwards, D.S., George, S.C., et al. Petroleum potential and kinetic models for hydrocarbon generation from the Upper Cretaceous to Paleogene Latrobe Group coals and shales in the Gippsland Basin, Australia. Org. Geochem. 2016, 91(1): 54-67.

Abbassi, S., George, S.C., Edwards, D.S., et al. Generation characteristics of Mesozoic syn-and post-rift source rocks, Bonaparte Basin, Australia: New insights from compositional kinetic modelling. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2014, 50(40): 148-165.

¨Uber die Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Arrhenius, S. Inversion von Rohrzucker durch S ¨auren. Z. Phys. Chem. 2017, 4(1): 226-248.

Braun, R.L., Burnham, A.K. Mathematical model of oil generation, degradation, and expulsion. Energy Fuels 1990, 4(2): 132-146.

Braun, R.L., Burnham, A.K., Reynolds, J.G., et al. Pyrolysis kinetics for lacustrine and marine source rocks by programmed micropyrolysis. Energy Fuels 2002, 5(1): 192-204.

Burnham, A.K., Braun, R.L., Gregg, H.R., et al. Comparison of methods for measuring kerogen pyrolysis rates and fitting kinetic parameters. Org. Geochem. 1988, 13(4): 839-845.

Chalmers, G.R., Bustin, R.M., Powers, I. A pore by any other name would be as small: The importance of meso-and microporosity in shale gas capacity. Paper Presented at the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 2009.

Chalmers, G.R., Bustin, R.M., Power, I.M. Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: Examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Hay-nesville, Marcellus, and Doig units. AAPG Bull. 2012, 96: 1099-1119.

Chen, Z., Liu, X., Guo, Q., et al. Inversion of source rock hydrocarbon generation kinetics from Rock-Eval data. Fuel 2017, 194: 91-101.

Clarkson, C.R., Solano, N., Bustin, R.M., et al. Pore structure characterization of North American shale gas reservoirs; using USANS/SANS, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion. Fuel 2013, 103(1): 606-616.

Coats, A.W., Redfern, J.P. Kinetic parameters from Thermo-gravimetric data. Nature 1964, 201(4914): 68-69.

Dieckmann, V. Modelling petroleum formation from heteroge-neous source rocks: The influence of frequency factors on activation energy distribution and geological prediction. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2005, 22(3): 375-390.

Espitali ´e, J., Madec, M., Tissot, B. Role of the mineral matrix in kerogen pyrolysis: Influence on petroleum generation and migration. AAPG Bull. 1980, 64: 59-66.

Flynn, J.H. The Temperature Integral-Its use and abuse. Thermochim. Acta 1997, 300(1-2): 83-92.

Friedman, H.L. Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. J. Polym. Sci. 1963, 6: 183-195.

Friedman, H.L. Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. J. Polym. Sci. Part C Polym. Symp. 1964, 6(1): 183-195.

Gorbachev, V.M. A solution of the exponential integral in the non-isothermal kinetics for linear heating. J. Therm. Anal. 1975, 8(2): 349-350.

Han, S., Horsfield, B., Zhang, J., et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of lacustrine Yanchang shale in Southeast Ordos Basin, North China. Energy Fuels 2014, 28(9): 5632-5639.

Hood, A. Organic metamorphism and the generation of petroleum. AAPG Bull. 1975, 59(6): 986-996.

Huang, W.L. Experimental study of vitrinite maturation: Effects of temperature, time, pressure, water, and hydrogen index. Org. Geochem. 1996, 24(2): 233-241.

˙Inan, S., Schenk, H.J. Evaluation of petroleum generation and expulsion from a source rock by open and restricted system pyrolysis experiments. Part I. Extrapolation of experimentally-derived kinetic parameters to natural systems. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2001, 58(2): 213-228.

Jurisch, S.A., Heim, S., Krooss, B.M., et al. Systematics of pyrolytic gas (N2 , CH4 ) liberation from sedimentary rocks: Contribution of organic and inorganic rock constituents. Int. J. Coal. Geol. 2012, 89(1): 95-107.

Larsen, E.C., Walton, J.H. Activated carbon as a catalyst in certain Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 2002, 44(1): 70-85.

Larter, S. Chemical modelling of vitrinite reflectance evolu-tion. Geol. Rundsch. 1989, 78: 349-359.

Lerche, I., Yarzab, R.E., Kendall, G.G.S.T.G. Determination of paleoheat flux from vitrinite reflectance data. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull. 1984, 68: 1704-1717.

Lewan, M.D. Evalution of petroleum generation by Hydrous Pyrolysis experimentation. Phi. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1985, 315: 123-134.

Lewan, M.D. Experiments on the role of water in petroleum formation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 1997, 61(17): 3691-3723.

Lewan, M.D., Ruble, T.E. Comparison of petroleum generation kinetics by isothermal hydrous and nonisothermal open-system pyrolysis. Org. Geochem. 2002, 33(12): 1457-1475.

Liao, L., Wang, Y., Chen, C., et al. Kinetic study of marine and lacustrine shale grains using Rock-Eval pyrolysis: Implications to hydrocarbon generation, retention and expulsion. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2018, 89: 164-173.

Miura, K. A new and simple method to estimate f (E) and k0 (E) in the distributed activation energy model from three sets of experimental data. Energy Fuels 1995, 9: 302-307.

Nielsen, S.B., Barth, T. Vitrinite reflectance: Comments on “A chemical kinetic model of vitrinite maturation and reflectance” by Alan K. Burnham and Jerry J. Sweeney. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 1991, 55(2): 639-641.

Passey, Q.R., Bohacs, K., Esch, W.L., et al. From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir-geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale gas reservoirs. Paper SPE 131350 Presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, 8-10 June, 2010.

Pepper, A.S., Corvi, P.J. Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation. Part I: Oil and gas generation from kerogen. Mar. Pet. Geol. 1995, 12(3): 291-319.

Peters, K.E. Petroleum generation kinetics: Single versus multiple-heating ramp open-system pyrolysis. Paper 41493 Presented at the AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Istanbul, Turkey, 14-17 September, 2014.

Peters, K.E., Burnham, A.K., Walters, C.C. Petroleum generation kinetics: Single versus multiple heating-ramp open-system pyrolysis. AAPG Bull. 2015, 99(4): 591-616.

Peters, K.E., Cassa, M.R. Applied source rock geochemistry: Chapter 5: Part II. Essential elements. AAPG Special Volumes 1994, 1994: 93-120.

Reynolds, J.G., Burnham, A.K. Comparison of kinetic analysis of source rocks and kerogen concentrates. Org. Geochem. 1995, 23(1): 11-19.

Reynolds, J.G., Burnham, A.K., Mitchell, T.O. Kinetic analy-sis of California petroleum source rocks by programmed temperature micropyrolysis. Org. Geochem. 1995, 23(2): 109-120.

Romero-Sarmiento, M.F., Euzen, T., Rohais, S., et al. Artificial thermal maturation of source rocks at different thermal maturity levels: Application to the Triassic Montney and Doig formations in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Org. Geochem. 2016, 97: 148-162.

Schaefer, R.G., Schenk, H.J., Hardelauf, H., et al. Determina-tion of gross kinetic parameters for petroleum formation from Jurassic source rocks of different maturity levels by means of laboratory experiments. Org. Geochem. 1990, 16(1-3): 115-120.

Schenk, H.J., Dieckmann, V. Prediction of petroleum forma-tion: The influence of laboratory heating rates on kinetic parameters and geological extrapolations. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2004, 21(1): 79-95.

Stainforth, J.G. Practical kinetic modeling of petroleum generation and expulsion. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2009, 26(4): 552-572.

Sundararaman, P., Merz, P.H., Mann, R.G. Determination of kerogen activation energy distribution. Energy Fuels 1992, 6(6): 793-803.

Sweeney, J.J. Evaluation of a simple model of vitrinite reflectance based on chemical kinetics. AAPG Bull. 1990, 10(10): 1559-1570.

Tissot, B.P., Espitali ´e, J. L’evolution thermique de la matiere organique des sediments: Applcatuib d’une simulation mathematique. Revue De 1’Iinstitut Francais Du Petrole 1975, 30: 743-777.

Tissot, B.P., Welte, D.H. Petroleum formation and occurrence. New York, USA, Springer-Verlag, 1984.

Ungerer, P. State of the art of research in kinetic modelling of oil formation and expulsion. Org. Geochem. 1990, 16(1-3): 1-25.

Ungerer, P., Pelet, R. Extrapolation of the kinetics of oil and gas formation from laboratory experiments to sedimentary basins. Nature 1987, 327: 42-54.

Wang, M., Lu, S., Xue, H. Kinetic simulation of hydrocarbon generation from lacustrine type I kerogen from the Songliao Basin: Model comparison and geological application. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2011, 28(9): 1714-1726.

Waples, D.W. Petroleum generation kinetics: Single versus multiple heating-ramp open-system pyrolysis. AAPG Bull. 2016, 100: 683-689.

Wood, D.A. Relationships between thermal maturity indices calculated using arrhenius equation and lopatin method: implications for petroleum exploration. AAPG Bull. 1988, 72(2): 115-135.

Wood, D.A. Re-establishing the merits of thermal maturity and petroleum generation multi-dimensional modelling with an arrhenius equation using a single activation energy. J. Earth Sci. 2017, 28(5): 804-834.

Wood, D.A. Kerogen conversion and thermal maturity modelling of petroleum generation: Integrated analysis applying relevant kerogen kinetics. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2018a, 89: 313-329.

Wood, D.A. Thermal maturity and burial history modelling of shale is enhanced by use of Arrhenius time-temperature index and memetic optimizer. Petroleum 2018b, 4: 25-42.

Wood, D.A., Hazra, B. Characterization of organic-rich shales for petroleum exploration and exploitation: A review-part 2: Geochemistry, thermal maturity, isotopes and biomarkers. J. Earth Sci. 2017, 28(5): 758-778.