Coupled microbial-geochemical reactions in underground hydrogen storage systems: From hydrogen loss to a cyclically perturbed reactive system
Abstract
Underground hydrogen storage involves repeated cycles of hydrogen injection and withdrawal, which change how formation fluids, minerals and microorganisms interact. Microbial hydrogen consumption and abiotic geochemical reactions are often treated separately, but in a storage reservoir they are connected through substrate supply, solution chemistry and mineral interfaces. Although direct reactions between hydrogen and formation minerals are slow at reservoir temperatures, fluid-mineral interaction can alter the fluid chemistry, the availability of microbial substrates, and the stability of secondary minerals associated with microbial activity. Because chemical and biological changes carry over from one storage cycle to the next, reservoir reactivity can change cumulatively: hydrogen consumption may decline, persist or recover as substrates, pH and microbial communities change. Cycle frequency, shut-in duration, cushion gas composition and fluid chemistry give operators some control over this evolution, but the conditions that minimize hydrogen loss do not necessarily minimize gas contamination or formation damage. Assessing these effects requires distinguishing among hydrogen loss pathways, multi-cycle experiments, in situ characterization and long-term monitoring to identify cumulative changes and help define operating limits.
Document Type: Perspective
Cited as: Lin, J., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Wang, Y., Ali, M. Coupled microbial-geochemical reactions in underground hydrogen storage systems: From hydrogen loss to a cyclically perturbed reactive system. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2026, 22(1): 91-94. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.10.08
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.10.08Keywords:
Underground hydrogen storage, hydrogen loss, microbial activity, geochemical reactions, cyclic operationReferences
Aftab, A., Salgar Chaparro, S. J., Ali, M., et al. Microbial risk assessment and mitigation for underground hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns: A multidisciplinary investigation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2026, 238: 117003.
Alanazi, A., Han, Z., Bokhari, A., et al. Microbial and geochemical reactions in underground hydrogen storage: A comprehensive review of experimental, modeling, and field studies. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 2026, 31: 101974.
Dopffel, N., Jansen, S., Gerritse, J. Microbial side effects of underground hydrogen storage – Knowledge gaps, risks and opportunities for successful implementation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(12): 8594-8606.
Duah, P., Johnson, M. B., Aryana, S. A. Subsurface storage of CO₂, H₂, and natural gas: A review of site-selection criteria and decision-support approaches. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2026, 20(3): 277-293.
Gao, J., Kong, D., Peng, Y., et al. Pore-scale mechanisms and hysteresis effect during multi-cycle injection and production process in underground hydrogen storage reservoir. Energy, 2023, 283: 129007.
Hematpur, H., Abdollahi, R., Rostami, S., et al. Review of underground hydrogen storage: Concepts and challenges. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2023, 7(2): 111-131.
Hellerschmied, C., Schritter, J., Waldmann, N., et al. Hydrogen storage and geo-methanation in a depleted underground hydrocarbon reservoir. Nature Energy, 2024, 9(3): 333-344.
Hemme, C., van Berk, W. Hydrogeochemical modeling to identify potential risks of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas fields. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(11): 2282.
Kabbaj, N., Marir, N., El-Amin, M. F. Coupled hysteresis and bio-geochemical effects on multi-cycle underground hydrogen storage performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2026, 241: 155497.
Lysyy, M., Føyen, T., Johannesen, E. B., et al. Hydrogen relative permeability hysteresis in underground storage. Geophysical Research Letters, 2022, 49(17): e2022GL100364.
Mura, J., Ranchou-Peyruse, M., Guignard, M., et al. Experimental simulation of H₂ coinjection via a high-pressure reactor with natural gas in a low-salinity deep aquifer used for current underground gas storage. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2024, 15: 1439866.
Tao, L., Liu, L., Zhu, S., Zhang, H. Caprock wettability: A cross-process perspective from CO₂ sequestration to underground hydrogen storage. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2025, 18(2): 199-201.
Thaysen, E. M., McMahon, S., Strobel, G. J., et al. Estimating microbial growth and hydrogen consumption in hydrogen storage in porous media. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 151: 111481.
Truche, L., Berger, G., Destrigneville, C., et al. Experimental reduction of aqueous sulphate by hydrogen under hydrothermal conditions: Implication for the nuclear waste storage. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2009, 73(16): 4824-4835.
Truche, L., Berger, G., Destrigneville, C., et al. Kinetics of pyrite to pyrrhotite reduction by hydrogen in calcite buffered solutions between 90 and 180 °C: Implications for nuclear waste disposal. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2010, 74(10): 2894-2914.
Vedadi, A., Mashhadzadeh, A. H., Faroughi, S. A. Multiscale impacts of microbial metabolism on geochemistry and hydrodynamics of underground hydrogen storage: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2026, 231: 154802.
Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Arif, M. A critical review of cushion gas in underground hydrogen storage: Thermophysical properties, interfacial interactions, and numerical perspectives. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2026, 347: 103701.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jianli Lin, Huan Li, Zirui Zhao, Yumeng Wang, Muhammad Ali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.