Engineered subsurface hydrogen generation: Insights for sustainable production system

Authors

  • Bin Wang State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, P. R. China
  • Haizhu Wang State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, P. R. China
  • Gensheng Li State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, P. R. China
  • Xiaochun Zhu State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, P. R. China
  • Alexey Cheremisin Center for Petroleum Science and Engineering, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia
  • Chengdong Yuan Center for Petroleum Science and Engineering, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia (Email: C.Yuan@skoltech.ru )

Abstract

Subsurface hydrogen generation encompasses both natural and engineered processes. Natural subsurface hydrogen, often referred to as geological hydrogen, is produced by in-situ geochemical reactions without human intervention. The term engineered subsurface hydrogen generation is adopted here to describe controllable reservoir operations aimed at producing hydrogen, which can be further divided into three routes, namely stimulated geological hydrogen via serpentinization of ultramafic rocks by water-looping, subsurface chemical looping via steel-slag-mediated iron redox water splitting, and subsurface conversion of organic-rich formations via thermal, biological, or chemical pathways. Only stimulated geological hydrogen falls within the strict definition of geological hydrogen; the other two are engineered subsurface processes that do not qualify as geological hydrogen. Our experiments on serpentinization indicate that hydrogen generation and release can be physically decoupled, implying that engineered production strategies such as pressure drawdown and cyclic injection-production are required. Crucially, the field value of engineered subsurface hydrogen generation depends on whether these hydrogen-generating reactions can be engineered as controllable reservoir operations. These routes therefore require reaction-specific production systems rather than a universal well pattern. Drawing on geothermal doublets, multistage-fractured horizontal wells, radial jet laterals, shock fracturing and blasting fracturing, a completion-centered framework is outlined in which wellbores, fractures, catalysts or reactive solids, renewable heating, hydrogen separation and underground storage are designed as one production system. Key questions are further identified, including reaction kinetics coupled with heat and mass transfer, catalyst and injectivity maintenance, and pilot evaluation by H2 recovery, energy output-input ratio and carbon balance.

Document Type: Editorial

Cited as: Wang, B., Wang, H., Li, G., Zhu, X., Cheremisin, A., Yuan, C. Engineered subsurface hydrogen generation: Insights for sustainable production system. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2026, 21(3): 297-300. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.09.08

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.09.08

Keywords:

Subsurface hydrogen generation, subsurface reactor engineering, geologic hydrogen, sustainable production system, serpentinization

References

Egert, R., Neupane, G., Jin, W., et al. On the viability of stimulated hydrogen generation from iron-rich formations. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2026, 256: 214130.

Ellison, E. T., Templeton, A. S., Kelemen, P. B., et al. Low-temperature hydrogen production and consumption in partially-hydrated peridotites in Oman: Implications for stimulated geological hydrogen production. Frontiers in Geochemistry, 2024, 2: 1366268.

Galvis Silva, H., Isah, A., Shabdirova, A., et al. An approach to sustainable hydrogen generation from stimulated iron-rich ultramafic rock. Geophysical Research Letters, 2025, 52: e2025GL119699.

Gong, F., Guo, T., Sun, W., et al. Evaluation of geothermal energy extraction in enhanced geothermal system (EGS) with multiple fracturing horizontal wells (MFHW). Renewable Energy, 2020, 149: 1214-1225.

Hassanpouryouzband, A., Veshareh, M. J., Wilkinson, M., et al. In situ hydrogen generation from underground fossil hydrocarbons. Joule, 2025, 9(2): 101809.

Li, J., Huang, Z., Li, G., et al. Field test of radial jet drilling technology in a surface formation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 218: 110928.

Liu, M., Warner, T., Zhao, Y., et al. Geologic hydrogen: From natural occurrences to anthropogenic generation - A review of fundamentals, potential, challenges and prospects. Earth-Science Reviews, 2025a, 274: 105338.

Liu, Q., Wei, Y., Li, P., et al. Natural hydrogen in the volcanic-bearing sedimentary basin: Origin, conversion, and production rates. Science Advances, 2025b, 11: eadr6771.

Liu, Q., Wu, X., Huang, X., et al. Integrated geochemical identification of natural hydrogen sources. Science Bulletin, 2024, 69(19): 2993-2996.

Mayhew, L. E., Ellison, E. T., McCollom, T. M., et al. Hydrogen generation from low-temperature water-rock reactions. Nature Geoscience, 2013, 6(6): 478-484.

McCollom, T. M., Bach, W. Thermodynamic constraints on hydrogen generation during serpentinization of ultramafic rocks. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2009, 73(3): 856-875.

O’Connor, J., Nguyen, T. B. T., Honeyands, T., et al. Production, characterisation, utilisation, and beneficial soil application of steel slag: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 419: 126478.

Pratama, R. A., Babadagli, T. What did we learn from steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) applications in three decades, and what is next? Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, 233: 212449.

Salahshoor, S., Afzal, S. Subsurface technologies for hydrogen production from fossil fuel resources: A review and techno-economic analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(92): 38949-38976.

Wang, B., Li, G., Huang, Z., et al. Hydraulics calculations and field application of radial jet drilling. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2016, 31(1): 71-81.

Wang, H., Li, G., He, Z., et al. Experimental investigation on abrasive supercritical CO2 jet perforation. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2018, 28: 59-65.

Wang, T., Li, G., Song, X., et al. Development of smart oil and gas fields with multi-energy synergy of wind, solar, geothermal and energy storage. Strategic Study of CAE, 2024, 26(4): 259-272.

Yang, Y., He, Z. Underground hydrogen storage and in-situ hydrogen production: Governing mechanisms, technological challenges, and future directions. Advances in Resources Research, 2026, 6(3): 1677-1704.

Yuan, Q., Wanambwa, S., Ifticene, M. A., et al. Stimulated geologic hydrogen: From mechanistic control to engineered rock transformation. Energy & Environmental Science, 2026, 19(10): 3100-3133.

Zhao, W., Hu, S., Hou, L. Connotation and strategic position of in-situ conversion of shale oil. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 537-545.

Zhao, W., Liu, W., Bian, C., et al. Enrichment mechanism and optimal in-situ conversion recovery method of lacustrine low-to-medium maturity shale oil. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2026, 53(1): 1-15.

Zhong, H., Cen, W., Xiao, X. Adsorption enhancement of water-gas shift to produce hydrogen of iron-calcium-based dual-functional materials based on steel slag. Low-Carbon Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 2025, 50(5): 155-162.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-07

How to Cite

Wang, B., Wang, H., Li, G., Zhu, X., Cheremisin, A., & Yuan, C. (2026). Engineered subsurface hydrogen generation: Insights for sustainable production system. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 21(3), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.09.08

Issue

Section

EDITORIAL