Subsurface storage of CO₂, H₂, and natural gas: A review of site-selection criteria and decision-support approaches
Abstract
The transition to a low-carbon energy system and the emergence of a hydrogen economy have increased the need for large-scale, reliable subsurface storage of carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and natural gas. Selecting suitable storage sites requires balancing geological, technical, environmental, economic, and social criteria, while accounting for the distinct physical and chemical behaviors of each gas and the intended service (e.g., permanent sequestration vs. cyclic storage). This paper adopts a unified, gas-aware framework to synthesize site-selection criteria and decision-support methods for subsurface gas storage across the principal geological options: deep saline aquifers, depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, and salt caverns. The study examines decision-making approaches ranging from conventional multi-criteria decision-making and fuzzy extensions to Geographic Information System-based spatial analysis, reservoir simulation, and emerging machine-learning techniques for large-scale screening and uncertainty quantification and mitigation. Drawing on global case studies, it identifies methodological limitations, gas-specific knowledge gaps, and data challenges that constrain confident site selection, particularly for hydrogen storage in deep saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs, including reactivity and microbial consumption risks, purity and mixing constraints, and cushion-gas economics. Future directions emphasize the need for integrated, explainable, and adaptive decision frameworks tailored to gas-specific behaviors and storage contexts; expanded large-scale H2 demonstrations in saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs; tighter coupling of monitoring, modeling, and decision tools throughout the project lifecycle; and regulatory frameworks that clarify long-term liability and strengthen public engagement and trust. Collectively, these insights provide a structured basis for developing robust and transparent decision pathways for strategic subsurface storage in support of energy-transition objectives.
Document Type: Original article
Cited as: Duah, P., Johnson, M. B., & Aryana, S. A. (2026). Subsurface storage of CO2, H2, and natural gas: A review of site-selection criteria and decision-support approaches. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 20(3), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.06.08
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.06.08Keywords:
Multi-criteria decision-making, geographic information system, machine learning, energy storage systems, geologic gas storage, underground gas storageReferences
Abdulla, A., Hanna, R., Schell, K. R., et al. Explaining successful and failed investments in U.S. carbon capture and storage using empirical and expert assessments. Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16(1): 014036.
Ahmed, E., Amaziane, B., Chabab, S., et al. Modeling and simulation of coupled biochemical and two-phase compositional flow in underground hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 168: 150947.
Alqahtani, A., He, X., Yan, B., et al. Uncertainty analysis of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers using machine learning and Bayesian optimization. Energies, 2023, 16(4): 1684.
Askari, A. A., Behrouz, T., Motahhari, S. M. Ranking of candidates for underground gas storage structures under uncertainties using flow simulation: West of Iran as a case study. Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology, 2020, 10(1): 37-45.
Babaei, S., Coasne, B., Ostadhassan, M. Adsorption-induced deformation in microporous kerogen by hydrogen and methane: Implications for underground hydrogen storage. Langmuir, 2025, 41(9): 6364-6375.
Bachu, S. Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change. Environmental Geology, 2003, 44(3): 277-289.
Bachu, S. Sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change: Road map for site selection using the transform of the geological space into the CO2 phase space. Energy Conversion and Management, 2002, 43: 87-102.
Bennion, D. B., Thomas, F. B., Ma, T., et al. Detailed protocol for the screening and selection of gas storage reservoirs. Paper SPE 59738 Presented at SPE Unconventional Resources Conference/Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 3-5 April, 2000.
Bérest, P., Brouard, B., Karimi-Jafari, M., et al. Maximum admissible pressure in salt caverns used for brine production and hydrocarbon storage. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue IFP Energies nouvelles, 2020, 75: 76.
Breukers, S., Upham, P. Organisational aspects of public engagement in European energy infrastructure planning: The case of early-stage CCS projects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2015, 58(2): 252-269.
Budiarto, O., Purwanto, W. W., Halimatussadiah, A., et al. Multi-period superstructure optimization for CCS source-sink matching in South Sumatra industrial clusters. Carbon Neutrality, 2025, 4(1): 20.
Chen, F., Ma, Z., Nasrabadi, H., et al. Capacity assessment and cost analysis of geologic storage of hydrogen: A case study in Intermountain-West Region USA. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(24): 9008-9022.
Coarita-Tintaya, E. -D., Golfier, F., Grgic, D., et al. Fully coupled THM modelling of damage and healing interactions in rock salt: Application to hydrogen storage in salt caverns. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 125: 374-390.
Colombe, C., Leibowicz, B. D., Mendoza, B. R. The effects of policy uncertainty and risk aversion on carbon capture, utilization, and storage investments. Energy Policy, 2024, 192: 114212.
Davoodi, S., Al-Shargabi, M., Wood, D. A., et al. Underground hydrogen storage: A review of technological developments, challenges, and opportunities. Applied Energy, 2025, 381: 125172.
de Brito, M. M., Almoradie, A., Evers, M. Spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in a MCDA-based flood vulnerability model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2019, 33(9): 1788-1806.
Derakhshani, R., Lankof, L., GhasemiNejad, A., et al. Artificial intelligence-driven assessment of salt caverns for underground hydrogen storage in Poland. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 14246.
Dixon, T., McCoy, S. T., Havercroft, I. Legal and regulatory developments on CCS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 40: 431-448.
Donnelly, J., Daneshkhah, A., Abolfathi, S. Physics-informed neural networks as surrogate models of hydrodynamic simulators. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 912: 168814.
Dopffel, N., Jansen, S., Gerritse, J. Microbial side effects of underground hydrogen storage-Knowledge gaps, risks and opportunities for successful implementation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(12): 8594-8606.
Fan, J. -L., Xu, M., Wei, S. -J., et al. Evaluating the effect of a subsidy policy on carbon capture and storage (CCS) investment decision-making in China-A perspective based on the 45Q tax credit. Energy Procedia, 2018, 154: 22-28.
Feldmann, F., Hagemann, B., Ganzer, L., et al. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic and gas mixing processes in underground hydrogen storages. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(16): 1165.
Ghaedi, M., Andersen, P. Ø., Gholami, R. Mixing dynamics and recovery factor during hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs. Gas Science and Engineering, 2024, 128: 205382.
Greene, R., Devillers, R., Luther, J. E., et al. GIS-based multiple-criteria decision analysis. Geography Compass, 2011, 5(9): 412-432.
Gunawan, T. A., Luo, H., Greig, C., et al. Shared CO2 capture, transport, and storage for decarbonizing industrial clusters. Applied Energy, 2024, 359: 122775.
Hajiyev, E., Watson, M., Emadi, H., et al. A comparative study of major risk assessment frameworks in geologic carbon storage. Fuels, 2025, 6(2): 42.
Heinemann, N., Scafidi, J., Pickup, G., et al. Hydrogen storage in saline aquifers: The role of cushion gas for injection and production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(79): 39284-39296.
Heinemann, N., Wilkinson, M., Adie, K., et al. Cushion gas in hydrogen storage—A costly CAPEX or a valuable resource for energy crises? Hydrogen, 2022, 3(4): 550-563.
Huang, J. -J., Chen, C. -Y. Using Markov random field and analytic hierarchy process to account for interdependent criteria. Algorithms, 2024, 17(1): 1.
Huijts, N. M. A., Midden, C. J. H., Meijnders, A. L. Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(5): 2780-2789.
Hussain, F., Michael, K., Cinar, Y. A numerical study of the effect of brine displaced from CO2 storage in a saline formation on groundwater. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2016, 6(1): 94-111.
Irfan, M., Koj, A., Sedighi, M., et al. GIS based site ranking using neighbourhood analysis and comparison. Paper presented at Sixth International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications, and Services (GEOProcessing 2014), Barcelona, Spain, 23-27 March, 2014.
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., et al. An overview of the status and challenges of CO2 storage in minerals and geological formations. Frontiers in Climate, 2019, 1: 9.
Lankof, L., Tarkowski, R. GIS-based analysis of rock salt deposits' suitability for underground hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(71): 27748-27765.
Li, J., Zhang, N., Xu, W., et al. The influence of cavern length on deformation and barrier integrity around horizontal energy storage salt caverns. Energy, 2022, 244: 123148.
Liu, N., Zhan, Y., Tan, R., et al. Unlocking carbon capture and storage potential: Policy incentives, economic challenges, and infrastructure integration for CO2 transport. Chain, 2025, 2(3): 211-226.
Löhndorf, N., Wozabal, D. Gas storage valuation in incomplete markets. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 288(1): 318-330.
Małachowska, A., Łukasik, N., Mioduska, J., et al. Hydrogen storage in geological formations—The potential of salt caverns. Energies, 2022, 15(14): 5038.
Malczewski, J. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. New York, USA, John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
Maldonado-Cruz, E., Pyrcz, M. J. Fast evaluation of pressure and saturation predictions with a deep learning surrogate flow model. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 212: 110244.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Md Nor, K., et al. Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications-A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2015, 28(1): 516-571.
Marvin, M. K., Fagorite, V. I., Grema, A. S., et al. Review of progress and implication of machine learning in geological carbon dioxide storage. Geosystem Engineering, 2025, 28(5): 299-332.
Mim, R. T., Negash, B. M., Jufar, S. R., et al. Minireview on CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers: Methods, opportunities, challenges, and perspectives. Energy & Fuels, 2023, 37(23): 18467-18484.
Miocic, J. M., Heinemann, N., Alcalde, J., et al. Enabling secure subsurface storage in future energy systems: An introduction, in Enabling Secure Subsurface Storage in Future Energy Systems, edited by J. M. Miocic, N. Heinemann, K. Edlmann, J. Alcade and R. A. Schultz, Geological Society, London, pp. 1-14, 2023.
Morris, A., Jankowski, P. Fuzzy techniques for multiple criteria decision making in GIS. Paper presented at Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 25-28 July, 2001.
Mu, L., Liao, X., Yu, Q., et al. Study on operation strategy of aquifer underground gas storage using CO2 as cushion gas. Paper CMTC 552947 MS Presented at Carbon Management Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 15-18 July, 2019.
Muhammed, N. S., Haq, M. B., Al Shehri, D. A., et al. Hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: A comprehensive review. Fuel, 2023, 337: 127032.
Nasrollahzadeh, B., Amiri, H. A. A., Ghabezloo, S. Field-scale fully coupled simulation of fluid flow and geomechanics: Gas storage/recovery process in a depleted sandstone reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 200: 108423.
Nassabeh, M., You, Z., Keshavarz, A., et al. Sub-surface geospatial intelligence in carbon capture, utilization and storage: A machine learning approach for offshore storage site selection. Energy, 2024, 305: 132086.
Oldenburg, C. M. Screening and ranking framework for geologic CO2 storage site selection on the basis of health, safety, and environmental risk. Environmental Geology, 2008, 54(8): 1687-1694.
Omobude, O. A., Tomomewo, O. S., Seyyedi, M., et al. Full-physics CO2 storage modelling in deep saline aquifers: State of the technology. Paper SPE 229588 Presented at Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (ADIPEC), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 3-6 November, 2025.
Oni, B. A., Adebayo, I. A., Ojo, V. O., et al. Insight into underground hydrogen storage in aquifers: Current status, modeling, economic approaches and future outlook. Energy & Fuels, 2025, 39(22): 10274-10303.
Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G. -H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2): 445-455.
Orujov, A., Coddington, K., Aryana, S. A. A review of CCUS in the context of foams, regulatory frameworks and monitoring. Energies, 2023, 16(7): 3284.
Overy, K., Martins, G. S. Regional geological screening tool for underground hydrogen storage in the Zechstein Halite of NE England. Paper presented at 85th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Oslo, Norway, 10-13 June, 2024.
Pelissari, R., Oliveira, M. C., Abackerli, A. J., et al. Techniques to model uncertain input data of multi-criteria decision-making problems: A literature review. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2021, 28(2): 523-559.
Plaat, H. Underground gas storage: Why and how, in Underground Gas Storage: Worldwide Experiences and Future Development in the UK and Europe, edited by D.J. Evans and R.A. Chadwick, Geological Society, London, pp. 25-37, 2009.
Pratama, E., Refani, M. O. Subsurface to surface network modeling for CO2 sequestration in a deep saline aquifer. Paper Presented at EAGE Conference on the Future of Energy-Role of Geoscience in the Energy Transition, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12-13 September, 2023.
Prigmore, S., Okon-Akan, O. A., Egharevba, I. P., et al. Cushion gas consideration for underground hydrogen storage. Encyclopedia, 2024, 4(2): 847-863.
Qian, X., You, S., Wang, R., et al. Underground hydrogen storage in salt cavern: A review of advantages, challenges, and prospects. Sustainability, 2025, 17(13): 5900.
Rashidi, S., Shariatipour, S., Bagheri, M. CO2 storage site selection: A comprehensive review of current approaches. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2025, 15(4): 487-510.
Raza, A., Mahmoud, M., Alafnan, S., et al. H2, CO2, and CH4 adsorption potential of kerogen as a function of pressure, temperature, and maturity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(21): 12767.
Razavi, S., Tolson, B. A., Burn, D. H. Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resources Research, 2012, 48(7): WR011527.
Ringrose, P. S., Furre, A.-K., Gilfillan, S. M. V., et al. Storage of carbon dioxide in saline aquifers: Physicochemical processes, key constraints, and scale-up potential. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 2021, 12: 471-494.
Roy, P. P., Abdullah, M. S., Siddique, I. M. Machine learning empowered geographic information systems: Advancing spatial analysis and decision making. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 22(1): 1387-1397.
Rutqvist, J. The geomechanics of CO2 storage in deep sedimentary formations. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2012, 30(3): 525-551.
Rutqvist, J., Rinaldi, A. P., Cappa, F., et al. Fault activation and induced seismicity in geological carbon storage - Lessons learned from recent modeling studies. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 8(6): 789-804.
Sabzevari, A. R., Delavar, M. R. GIS-based site selection for underground natural resources using fuzzy AHP-OWA. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2017, XLII-4/W4: 463-468.
Sadkhan, R. A., Al-Mudhafar, W. J. Key aspects of underground hydrogen storage in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs and saline aquifers: A review and understanding. Energy Geoscience, 2024, 5(4): 100339.
Safari, A., Sugai, Y., Salgar-Chaparro, S. J., et al. Hydrogen-consuming bacteria in underground hydrogen storage: Bacterial diversity and mathematical modeling of their impacts on storage efficiency. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025, 113: 115519.
Schultz, R. A., Williams-Stroud, S., Horváth, B., et al. Underground energy-related product storage and sequestration: Site characterization, risk analysis and monitoring, in Enabling Secure Subsurface Storage in Future Energy Systems, edited by J. M. Miocic, N. Heinemann, K. Edlmann, J. Alcade and R. A. Schultz, Geological Society, London, pp. 37-59, 2023.
Sheikheh, S., Rabiei, M., Rasouli, V. A review of evaporite beds potential for storage caverns: Uncovering new opportunities. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(9): 4685.
Shi, Z., Driba, D. L., Lopez Rivera, N., et al. A review of coupled geochemical-geomechanical impacts in subsurface CO2, H2, and air storage systems. Energies, 2024, 17(12): 2928.
Shogenova, A., Piessens, K., Holloway, S., et al. Implementation of the EU CCS Directive in Europe: Results and development in 2013. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 6662-6670.
Talukdar, M., Blum, P., Heinemann, N., et al. Techno-economic analysis of underground hydrogen storage in Europe. iScience, 2024, 27(1): 108771.
Tarkowski, R., Uliasz-Misiak, B., Tarkowski, P. Storage of hydrogen, natural gas, and carbon dioxide-Geological and legal conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(38): 20010-20022.
Tayyib, D. M., Elsayed, T., Okoroafor, E. R. Techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of subsurface hydrogen and synthetic geothermal storage technologies. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025, 118: 116020.
Uliasz-Misiak, B., Lewandowska-Smierzchalska, J., Matula, R. Criteria for selecting sites for integrated CO2 storage and geothermal energy recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 285: 124822.
Van Rooijen, W. A., Hajibeygi, H. Site selection for underground hydrogen storage in porous media: Critical review and outlook. Energy & Fuels, 2025, 39(41): 19600-19613.
Verdon, J. P., Bommer, J. J. Green, yellow, red, or out of the blue? An assessment of traffic light schemes to mitigate the impact of hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity. Journal of Seismology, 2021, 25(1): 301-326.
Wallquist, L., Seigo, S. L., Visschers, V. H. M., et al. Public acceptance of CCS system elements: A conjoint measurement. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 6: 77-83.
Wang, H., Han, J., Zhang, K., et al. An interpretable interflow simulated graph neural network for reservoir connectivity analysis. SPE Journal, 2021, 26(4): 1636-1651.
Wang, J., Feng, X., Wanyan, Q., et al. Hysteresis effect of three-phase fluids in the high-intensity injection-production process of sandstone underground gas storages. Energy, 2022, 242: 123058.
Wang, P., Robinson, A. J., Papadokonstantakis, S. Prospective techno-economic and life cycle assessment: A review across established and emerging carbon capture, storage and utilization (CCS/CCU) technologies. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2024, 12: 1412770.
Warren, J. K. Solution mining and salt cavern usage, in Evaporites: A Geological Compendium, edited by J. K. Warren, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1303-1374, 2016.
Wei, B., Wang, B., Li, X., et al. CO2 storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs: A review. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2023, 9(2): 76-93.
Wen, G., Li, Z., Long, Q., et al. Real-time high-resolution CO2 geological storage prediction using nested Fourier neural operators. Energy and Environment Science, 2023, 16(4): 1732-1741.
Wickham, D., Hawkes, A., Jalil-Vega, F. Hydrogen supply chain optimisation for the transport sector-Focus on hydrogen purity and purification requirements. Applied Energy, 2022, 305: 117740.
Williams, J. D. O., Williamson, J. P., Parkes, D., et al. Does the United Kingdom have sufficient geological storage capacity to support a hydrogen economy? Estimating the salt cavern storage potential of bedded halite formations. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 53: 105109.
Wilson, E. J., Friedmann, S. J., Pollak, M. F. Research for deployment: Incorporating risk, regulation, and liability for carbon capture and sequestration. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41: 5945-5952.
Wu, L., Hou, Z., Luo, Z., et al. Site selection for underground bio-methanation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Energy, 2024, 306: 132437.
Wu, X., Qi, F., Li, X., et al. Towards a geological digital twin: Integrating multi-dimensional geological models for comprehensive earth system representation. Paper Presented at International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Beijing, China, 22-24 August, 2025.
Yang, S., Hu, S., Qi, Z., et al. Stability evaluation of fault in hydrocarbon reservoir-based underground gas storage: A case study of W gas storage. Fuel, 2024, 357: 129657.
Zhang, G., Zhu, S., Zeng, D., et al. Sealing capacity evaluation of underground gas storage under intricate geological conditions. Energy Geoscience, 2024, 5(3): 100292.
Zhang, H. Regulations for carbon capture, utilization and storage: Comparative analysis of development in Europe, China and the Middle East. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 173: 105722.
Zhang, X. M., Moodie, N., Dupree, R., et al. Assessing seismic risk for CO2 geologic storage: Comparative analysis of the Delaware Basin and Basin and Range Province projects. Paper presented at ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, 8-11 June, 2025.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.