Formation mechanisms of high‑quality ultra‑deep clastic reservoirs: Progress, scientific challenges and future directions

Authors

  • Huan Li Hubei Key Laboratory of Complex Shale Oil and Gas Geology and Development in Southern China, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, P. R. China (Email: lihuantry@yangtzeu.edu.cn)
  • Xiyu Qu School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, P. R. China
  • Jianli Lin Hubei Key Laboratory of Complex Shale Oil and Gas Geology and Development in Southern China, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, P. R. China
  • Wei Wang School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China
  • Achyut Mishra Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India
  • Eric Ansah WH Bryan Mining & Geology Research Centre, Sustainable Minerals Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia

Abstract

As hydrocarbon exploration continues to advance into ultra‑deep formations, conventional theories of reservoir formation based primarily on compaction, pore preservation, and dissolution are increasingly being challenged. Growing exploration practice indicates that the formation of high‑quality ultra‑deep clastic reservoirs cannot be explained simply as a deeper continuation of conventional deep reservoir evolution. Instead, ultra‑deep reservoirs may represent a distinct geological regime, where reservoir evolution is governed by physical and chemical principles fundamentally different from those operating under conventional burial conditions. This work reviews the evolution of scientific understanding of reservoir formation in deep and ultra‑deep clastic reservoirs and identifies several fundamental scientific issues that remain unresolved. It is suggested that the formation of high‑quality ultra‑deep reservoirs should be interpreted as the evolution of an open reservoir‑forming system driven by the coupled interactions among the mass, thermal, pressure, stress, fluid, and chemical fields. Accordingly, the research paradigm is shifting from pore evolution toward the reservoir‑forming system. More importantly, this paradigm shift may provide the conceptual foundation for an emerging discipline of Ultra‑deep Reservoir Geology, offering a new theoretical framework for understanding, predicting, and evaluating high‑quality reservoirs in the ultra‑deep subsurface.

Document Type: Perspective 

Cited as: Li, H., Qu, X., Lin, J., Wang, W., Mishra, A., Ansah, E.O. Formation mechanisms of high‑quality ultra‑deep clastic reservoirs: Progress, scientific challenges and future directions. Advances in Geo‑Energy Research, 2026, 21(3): 201‑204. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.09.01

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.09.01

Keywords:

Ultra-deep reservoir, clastic reservoirs, reservoir-forming systems, multi-ffeld coupling, ultra-deep reservoir geology, stress-ffuid-rock interactions

References

Antonellini, M., Sole, L. D., Mollema, P. N., et al. Effects of outcrop‑scale structural and diagenetic heterogeneities on flow and mass transport in a porous sandstone aquifer. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2025, 177: 107406.

Bjorlykke, K. O. Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties. Some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins. Sedimentary Geology, 2014, 301: 1‑14.

Carbillet, L., Heap, M. J., Baud, P., et al. The influence of grain size distribution on mechanical compaction and compaction localization in porous rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2022, 11: e2022JB025216.

Dou, L., Liu, X., Wen, Z., et al. Accumulation characteristics and exploration progress of global ultra‑deep oil and gas. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2026, 53: 366‑383.

Fall, A., Eichhubl, P., Bodnar, R. J., et al. Natural hydraulic fracturing of tight‑gas sandstone reservoirs, Piceance Basin, Colorado. GSA Bulletin, 2015, 127: 61‑75.

Gac, S., Huismans, R. S., Simon, N. S. C., et al. Effects of lithosphere buckling on subsidence and hydrocarbon maturation: A case‑study from the ultra‑deep East Barents Sea basin. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2014, 407: 123‑133.

Haile, B. G., Czarniecka, U., Xi, K., et al. Hydrothermally induced diagenesis: Evidence from shallow marine‑deltaic sediments, Wilhelmya, Svalbard. Geoscience Frontiers, 2019, 10: 629‑649.

Houseknecht, D. W. Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71: 633‑642.

Konrad‑Schmollke, M., Halama, R., Wirth, R., et al. Mineral dissolution and precipitation mediated by an amorphous phase. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 1637.

Li, H., Hu, Q., Jones, S., et al. A review and discussion on the influences of grain‑coating clay minerals on water‑rock interactions in sandstones. Earth‑Science Reviews, 2025, 263: 105073.

Niemeijer, A. R., Spiers, C. J., Bos, B. Compaction creep of quartz sand at 400‑600 °C: experimental evidence for dissolution‑controlled pressure solution. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 195: 261‑275.

Pranter, M. J., Reza, Z. A., Budd, D. A., et al. Reservoir‑scale characterization and multiphase fluid‑flow modelling of lateral petrophysical heterogeneity within dolomite facies of the Madison Formation, Sheep Canyon and Lysite Mountain, Wyoming, USA. Petroleum Geoscience, 2006, 12: 29‑40.

Weber, J., Cheshire, M. C., Bleuel, M., et al. Influence of microstructure on replacement and porosity generation during experimental dolomitization of limestones. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2021, 303: 137‑158.

Yan, Y., Zhang, L., Luo, X., et al. Simulation of ductile grain deformation and the porosity loss predicted model of sandstone during compaction based on grain packing texture. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208: 109583.

Yan, H., Zhou, T., Zhou, X., et al. Non‑monotonic evolution and spatial reorganization mechanism of thermally induced micro‑damage in sandstone. Advances in Geo‑Energy Research, 2025, 17: 135‑148.

Yuan, G., Cao, Y., Jin, Z., et al. Thermally driven organic‑inorganic interactions in sedimentary basins: A review from source rocks to reservoirs. Earth‑Science Reviews, 2025, 262: 105043.

Zhang, C., Liu, D., She, M., et al. Direct constraints on shale fluid overpressure evolution from U‑Pb dating of bed‑parallel fracture‑filling calcite. Geology, 2025, 53: 1051‑1055.

Schmidt, V., McDonald, D. A. The role of secondary porosity in the course of sandstone diagenesis, in Aspects of Diagenesis, edited by P. A. Scholle and P. R. Schluger, SPEM Special Publication 26, pp. 175‑207, 1979.

Worden, R. H., Armitage, P. J., Butcher, A. R., et al. Petroleum reservoir quality prediction: overview and contrasting approaches from sandstone and carbonate communities, in Reservoir Quality of Clastic and Carbonate Rocks: Analysis, Modelling and Prediction, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2018, 435.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Li, H., Qu, X., Lin, J., Wang, W., Mishra, A., & Ansah, E. (2026). Formation mechanisms of high‑quality ultra‑deep clastic reservoirs: Progress, scientific challenges and future directions. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 21(3), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.09.01